|
||||||
|
In the late 1990s and early 2000s, the corporate paradigm was very customer-centric, deploying strategies and tools that promoted Customer Relationship Management tactics. Companies were primarily concerned with keeping existing customers and securing new ones. Now, that paradigm is shifting inward toward the employees. Companies realize they can reduce turnover of key personnel and, as a result, increase revenue by truly rewarding top performers. These compensation structures are not only for executives with "Management by Objective” programs. The truly effective organizations offer these programs to all employees. Quite simply, that is the key to successfully transforming your organization. Transform to a Pay for Performance Organization
Once you complete these critical stages, you will begin noticing some of the most common characteristics of pay for performance organizations including alignment of individual performance and pay to corporate objectives, employee behavior that maximizes revenue, a flexible operating environment that allows quick reaction to market changes, and an organization designed for growth. Realize Benefits by Optimizing Processes and Technology There are a handful of best-of-breed and enterprise application software products that effectively handle compensation management. (You can even outsource this function.) All of these products must be integrated with other systems that provide or receive critical data (e.g., Human Resources, Enterprise Resource Planning, Sales Force, Billing, and Payroll Systems). It is imperative that these systems and the data used to operate them are correct. After all, accurate and timely payouts of these rewards ultimately show the finished product of a Pay for Performance organization. | ||||||
| | ||||||
What can HR and Recruiting departments do to become more effective and improve the quality of hire so hiring officials are more satisfied (and engaged) and their company not only finds but attracts the top talent? Let's look at some interesting findings before we address some helpful techniques. AIRS recently conducted a survey of 72 companies across 20 industries (AIRS Quality of Hire Metrics Survey 2004) to determine how organizations determine their quality of hire. Below is a list of five key findings:
The survey discovered that the most common quality of hire metrics are:
From these statistics, we can conclude that few companies effectively measure the quality of their hires and those that do use blunt instruments. How can your organization improve the quality of its hires? How can you motivate your recruiters? Certainly we must be reasonable if your organization is starting from scratch. Even so, it's important that we watch the metrics and (as the Pay for Performance article above indicates) compensate our recruiters accordingly. As a first step to improving the quality of your hires, you must collect the metrics. Be reasonable, but collect them. There are three tools that will make the difference. These are listed below. The key driver is knowing this information will be collected and measured and that people will be managed and compensated by the results.
Hiring Manager Survey – Make sure the hiring managers fill these out for each recruiter. Some of the core metrics that should be captured in the survey are new hire quality, actual vs. contracted time-to-start, customer satisfaction, and efficiency. (Please note that the actual vs. contracted time-to-start is different than time-to-fill. Time-to-fill is how long it takes to find the new employee. This isn't necessarily the key metric in improving hiring official satisfaction or improving the quality of your hires. The more telling indicator is the variance between the time the recruiter indicated it would take to find the individual and the actual amount of time it took.) Attrition Rate – How many of your employees left within the first year. Performance – Have the hiring official rate the new employee at 90 & 180 days. Aggregate the performance for all employees the recruiter hired. These tools may seem simple. Few companies, however, succeed in gathering this data and fewer still compensate their recruiters on it. Taking steps to evaluate the quality of hires and improve hiring official satisfaction will go a long way to improving your company's ability to hire top talent. Getting the hiring officials to want to be more actively engaged will really make the difference. |
||||||
Openings Feedback Subscribe |